Description
There is currently no agreed upon ethical guidelines for the provision of post-trial access to experimental neurotechnological devices (e.g. deep brain stimulation, cortical implants and brain computer interfaces to restore mobility and sensation). Some studies require the explanation of the device at the end of a trial, even if the device is providing a therapeutic benefit. In other studies, the provision of support for the device is poorly or opaquely described. Responsibility for post-trial access is often shared between a range of stakeholders, including research groups, health care systems, industry, insurance companies and the individual. This scoping review will examine international ethical guidelines for the provision of post-trial access to neurotechnologies. The review will also critically examine international documents (e.g. Declaration of Helsinki) that offer advice on post-trial access to other treatments, such as pharmaceuticals. Findings of this study will be used to develop a set of ethical guidelines for the design and post-trial care in trials of invasive neuortechnologies, and identify areas for further research and agreement.
Essential criteria:
Minimum entry requirements can be found here: https://www.monash.edu/admissions/entry-requirements/minimum
Keywords
ethics, post-trial care, post-trial access, neurotechnology, deep brain stimulation, DBS, brain computer interface, brain implants, scoping review
School
School of Psychological Sciences » The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health
Available options
Masters by research
Masters by coursework
Honours
BMedSc(Hons)
Time commitment
Full-time
Part-time
Physical location
Monash Biomedical Imaging facility
Co-supervisors
Assoc Prof
Adrian Carter
Dr
John Gardner
Mr
Nathan Higgins